Protocols. I Want.

I love protocols.

Do you want me to call you sir? Yes sir! (And apologies for the non-inclusive language, ma’am!)

Do you want me on the floor? Prod me till I get the position right, please?

Do you want me to heel you, or forget the word ‘but’, or owe every morsel of food to your permission? Seriously?

Then thank you so much for telling me! And thank you even more for figuring it out and correcting me again and again, because that’s the hard part.

You get the idea. I like protocols. They’re a gift from God. A gift from you.

Admittedly, not every rule is fun. I wince at the idea of calling myself “she” as in the Pride Household Servant Protocol (link defunct). Or worse, “it” as in the Butchmanns Academy Slave Protocol (edit: apparently only SlaveMaster does that). But I think my hard limit is good acting. The Code d’Odalisque says it is proper for a sex slave to be modest, and it is proper for a sex slave to be salacious. I quite agree, but one of those I can’t do.

Oddly enough, it’s not the rules that worry me most. It’s when they try to justify them. I have never seen a satisfying explanation of why we do this.

Yes, protocols help to prevent break-ups and unhappiness, but how? Yes, they’re hot, but then why do we keep going round the clock? Yes, they make your relationship special – but sir, if uniqueness is all you want, I can sew you a very nice set of matching His and Hers purple/chartreuse frilly underwear.

And no, it’s not because subs are lowly creatures who need to be reminded of our place. Or because doms are superior beings who deserve all this. What a ghastly idea. That kind of talk belongs strictly in the haze of subspace/topspace.

There is one and only one reason why I would obey a protocol: because I want to. But no one has ever managed to put my wants into words. So here goes.

Let me introduce you to the biophysics of abject submission.

Inside this sub is a core of jelly-like matter. (Note for Americans and other non-English speakers: jelly as in Jell-O, not jam.)

Said jelly quivers constantly in the presence of any man I respect and am attracted to. Upon perceiving his disappointment, it goes splat. At his righteous anger, it freezes and shatters.

Inconveniently, these functions are calibrated at hair-trigger sensitivity. Fortunately, the jelly also responds to similarly trivial quantities of approval by liquefying itself in paroxysms of gratitude.

If you’re a dish of a dom and we’ve met, you probably still haven’t met my jelly. It lives deep in the closet. Most people don’t want to know about it. And of course jelly aims to oblige, whether it means impersonating a dragon lady, tranquil maiden, or woman about town.

But you see the problem. I really, really want to know what I’m supposed to do.

And that goes into overdrive when I’m alone with my dom. If my voice has sounded for ten seconds, I’ve probably agonised five times about how to signal my deference. Under such conditions, formulas like “Sir, yes sir, thank you sir” are a mercy, not a burden.

It gets better. If I’m not sure how you’d like your coffee, I will stand paralysed between visions of your gustatory disgust and terrors of absorbing precious seconds of your time if I ask. I want to ask permission to ask my questions. Of course it’s ridiculously recursive, but good grief, what a relief!

I also kind of want to kick myself in the head for wasting your time like this.

But the urge will magically go away if you can make me believe that this is what you want too. Vague praise apparently isn’t enough – I tend to assume it’s kindness and indulgence talking. Rules, enforcement and correction, however, do add up to a convincing result. I’ll trust you to take what you want – if you keep it up.

And paradoxically, protocols also help me believe that you’ll listen to what I want.

Binding my tongue sets it free. Do you know how hard it is to tell you things you don’t want to hear? You can’t imagine how much it helps if you give me the means to perform rhetorical genuflections throughout.

And that’s not even the worst-case scenario. Without a protocol for expressing disagreement with your orders, do you know what would happen? Pretty much the same thing, actually: feeble protests, swift capitulation, cheerful acceptance. That is, the first time. Until we realise that my smiles have blinded you to the wreckage. And then the second time is not much fun to describe.

That’s why I’m so grateful when we both know exactly how many times I’m allowed to argue with an order – be it three times or zero. Then I can smile and obey and not worry that I’m lying by omission.

That’s what I mean when I say I want a protocol. These are things I want to do. It’s in my jelly nature to bow and scrape to my dom even when I’m inwardly aghast. But painful experience has taught me that the distance between what I think and what I do is liable to be interpreted by the non-submissive as cowardice, two-facedness, or selfish whimsy. And that hurts.

God knows I have my faults. But my submission comes from the best in me, not the worst. If you give me a protocol, maybe I can trust you to understand that, and to try to protect my poor gelatinous heart.

Because a protocol isn’t just a leash for me, or an ego trip for you. Or a panacea for all our problems, come to that. I think it’s really a promise that you know what you want. That I can please you.

And that is what I want.

I have no idea if I’m the only one who feels this way. And the dom point of view remains very mysterious to me. Maybe my kind readers will enlighten me?

 

The Consent Debate: Then and Now

I started a BDSM classics reading group! People actually signed up and everything! Squee!

Ahem.

For our first meeting on 3rd September, we’re going to read seminal essays from the Safe Sane Consensual debate.

  1. Unsafe at Any Speed, or Safe, Sane, and Consensual, My Fanny by Laura Antoniou (1995)
  2. The SSC Mistake by Joseph W. Bean (1998)
  3. The Future of Leather by Joseph W. Bean (2000)
  4. The Origin of RACK / RACK vs. SSC by Gary Switch (2001)
  5. Safe Sane Consensual: The Making of a Shibboleth by david stein (2002)
  6. Consent Alone Is Not Enough by david stein (2013)
  7. How to Do the Right Kinky Thing by david stein (2005-2014)
  8. Short story: Spontaneous by Dusk Peterson (2006)

For a cheat sheet and more, please see the official webpage.

I am so grateful to david stein and Joseph Bean for their warm and material support in getting this list together. I regret that this ungrateful child of another age will now tell you where she departs from her revered elders.

(But we do agree that the discussion needs to happen. That’s why I revere them.)

My first surprise was that we know who originated the phrase Safe Sane Consensual: david stein. If you want to think about BDSM ethics, he’s your man. We’re reading three essays by him.

My second surprise was that he is appalled at how his words have been interpreted. Let me quote his responses in “Safe Sane Consensual: The Making of a Shibboleth”.

[S]ome people use simplistic conceptions of SSC as sticks to beat anyone whose limits go beyond theirs, while others apparently think mere lip service to the SSC idol absolves them of any responsibility to behave with decency or compassion. [source]

Agreed! Ethics is more than Safe Sane Consensual.

Just because an S/M interaction is safe, sane, and consensual doesn’t mean that it’s well done, mutually satisfying, or worth emulating! … On the other hand, an extremely risky, “lunatic,” or dubiously consensual scene might provide peak experiences that neither party — assuming they survive it – would want to have missed. [source]

Did you just say dubious consent?

Joseph W. Bean has suggested “seducing consent” as an alternative to the negotiation paradigm for leathersex encounters. [source] [ultimate source] [more]

Wait. Seduction?

That’s some generation gap.

Is there an ethical divide as well? Well, that depends on whether you accept Joseph Bean’s argument in “The Future of Leather”.

Was this safe? I survived it. Was it sane? I’m still permitted to walk the streets. Was it consensual? Well, yes. The only thing we feared more than being singled out by one of the men was NOT being noticed by them. Week after week, whenever I was invited, I was at the apartment where the whips and chains and the MEN would be. If you sit by the telephone for hours waiting for the invitation phone call, whatever you’re waiting for, if you get it, is consensual. [source]

He’s not wrong. That is consensual.

But do I want to go back to those days? God no.

If you’re ever in doubt about the ethical acceptability of a scenario, there’s something very simple you can try: flip the genders. So I imagined a 1950s girl waiting by the phone for a date. And my heart tore and bled. It became blindingly clear that that is consensual only because her other options are all bad.

Consent is choice. Choice is always limited. The Old Guard weren’t trying to limit anyone’s choices – quite the opposite. In my book, they did nothing wrong.

But I like my options. And my doms like knowing that I’ve got them. Imagine the burden of responsibility otherwise.

And maybe that means I will never have what they had, even in Laura Antoniou’s Middle-Aged Guard days.

I want to tell them about the pleas of the damned, the cries when someone doesn’t know when it’s going to stop or how, when they want their mommy, or they want their master, or when they want to surrender and fall to the ground and feel a boot at the back of their neck and grind away until they come and it’s terrible.

But I smile, and I nod, and I pass on, and I don’t even say a fucking thing. [source]

It’s true. Nobody fantasises about laying down limits and safewording. We dream of the razor edge of real fear, the hypnotic thrill of real compulsion, the clank and WHAP! of real consequences. It’s kink on turbo drive.

And if that was once your sole reality, I can see why it would be unthinkable to give it up. After all, I’ve written just as nostalgically about devastating gender inequality.

I’ve heard there were more train wrecks back in the day. I can believe it. But I can also see why that’s an acceptable cost to some people who grew up with it.

The thing that helped me to see that, oddly, was a Broadway song called “I Miss the Mountains”. It’s really about how pills can be worse than mental illness, but she certainly sounds like one of us.

Ironically, in these times of choice, my elders don’t even have the option of reliving the old days with modern consenting partners. As david stein says, consent rests on expectations. And is this how you expect to play?

I promise, as most tops were doing 35 years ago, that even if the boy doesn’t always say yes or even get the opportunity to do so, he’ll go away after the scene glad that I took yes for an answer when he couldn’t have thought to say it. Consent, you see, in my feudal world-view, is comprehensive. If you’re in my space, your presence IS consent. [source]

Joseph Bean, that’s, um, wow. You certainly know how to seduce. I love the moment when the door closes and a man knows I’m in his power.

But I had no idea there used to be kinksters who thought of the door as consent. If that’s a shared assumption, well and good. Otherwise, it’s not consent.

And that’s why Joseph Bean and our other ethical elders have compromised with the times. Those assumptions must be spoken now. I cannot regret that.

But then, I never knew the mountains. I think I’ve only given seduced/dubious consent twice in my D/s life. The first turned out badly. The other was amazing. Both doms were doing their best, so I don’t blame either of them. But someone else might. And I don’t understand why any dom today would knowingly take that risk.

So I don’t want to ask, “Was it consensual?” and get stuck there. I have different questions now. Was it ethical? Is it worth it?

The world has changed, and our assumptions with it. And I am damn grateful for my options.

Especially if I get to supply some of my own pleas of the damned!

e[lust] #61 – Writing about Writing

Welcome to Elust #61 – The only place where the smartest and hottest sex bloggers are featured under one roof every month. Whether you’re looking for sex journalism, erotic writing, relationship advice or kinky discussions it’ll be here at Elust. Want to be included in Elust #62? Start with the rules, come back September 1st to submit something and subscribe to the RSS feed for updates!

– This Month’s Top Three Posts –

Bloggers, please
I Touch Myself
Stunt Porn / People Porn

– Featured Post (Molly’s Picks) –

Is sex unsexy? A ‘His & Hers’ post
Van Gogh, an erotic author and a selfie…

– Readers Choice from Sexbytes

*You really should consider adding your popular posts here too*

His Desires

All blogs that have a submission in this edition must re-post this digest from tip-to-toe on their blogs within 7 days. Re-posting the photo is optional and the use of the “read more…” tag is allowable after this point. Thank you, and enjoy!

Continue reading

A Love Poem for the Not‑So‑Polyamorous

This is the first blog post I’ve been able to write in a month! Hurray!

I am so not the right person to write about polyamory. I wasn’t born that way, and I have no success stories to share (yet).

I can tell you not to do it with someone who has communication paralysis, or someone who believes in strong and silent. Guess which one was me? I can also attest to the sex-to-processing ratio and poly dominoes (FetLife login required).

And I can tell you that a lot of poly writing bothers me.

I will reluctantly put up with more calls for secondaries to be treated like human beings. If people need to hear it, people need to hear it. But what on earth is the point of telling us, lengthily, that jealousy means everyone else is doing it wrong? I mean, I’m happy for you, but you’re just making the rest of us feel inadequate. And jealous!

Moral trumpeting doesn’t work so well for me. My ethics are processed through the heart. I question my squicks, I unfold my squees. Tell me how you feel. The pain, the beauty, the grit. Then I’ll want to do what I should do.

And that’s why I treasure this poem about Mormon sister-wives.

I look in the mirror.
The glass is my friend.
I count all the wrinkles.
They never end.
He touches my forehead.
He kisses my cheek,
And I know he is thinking of her.

We walk by the temple.
We rest by a tree.
He looks to be thinking,
But not of me.
He stood here before,
And the memory’s good,
And I know he is thinking of her.

I see how he watches
Her step and her smile.
He laughs and he listens,
And in a while
He gives her his hand –
But that hand is mine!
It is not. It was given to her,
That terrible stranger,
My beautiful sister,
His wife.

– Orson Scott Card, Saints (end of Book Seven, 1984/2001)

The book says this is a love poem for a sister-wife. Hmm. I’m not sure what it is. But I do know that as a monogamous type, when I try to navigate the poly world with honesty and humanity and love, this is me.

 

Rape Play Is Not Rape: Guest Post by Dr. Slut

The inimitable Dr. Slut returns! Today she tells us more about one of her favourite things: not-rape. Trigger warning: rape role-play, sexual trauma, swords.
Care bear with rainbow-coloured infinity symbol over an outlined heart
Image: Dr. Slut

The idea that a guy might beg his tormentor to stop whipping and flogging him even though he was, in some complicated way enjoying it, is so intuitively built into BDSM culture that we tend to expect people to have “safewords” as a matter of course – words that really mean no, so “no” doesn’t have to mean “stop.” But experienced kinksters know that there are a lot of subtleties to that: no means no when you walk up to a random girl and proposition her for play, but it doesn’t necessarily mean no at the point where you’ve got a negotiated knife at her throat. At the point where you throw sex in there, you get a particular brand of consensual nonconsent that we often call “rape play.”

But even in Kinkland, there’s a pretty strong sense that pleading no to a whip on your clit isn’t quite the same as begging someone not to stick their dick in you. Consequently, “rape play” occupies a strange place in the BDSM scene. On the one hand, it tends to be fairly well institutionalized: many events arrange for mock kidnappings which often include “rapes”; people teach classes on it at kink events; and many cities have their own squads devoted to fulfilling people’s “rape” fantasies. At the same time, it’s almost universally considered “edge play” – play that’s especially sensitive, dangerous, and controversial. It’s a little bit ironic, since when you think about it, (protected) sex where someone just happens to say “no” is really probably a lot physically safer than 90% of sadomasochistic activities not labeled “edgeplay.” Obviously, many “rape play” scenes tend to incorporate a lot of other forms of sadomasochistic activities as well, but that’s not really the “rape” part that’s physically dangerous in that case. Rape play is edgeplay because it’s so psychologically and culturally loaded.

Yet in some sense, “rape play” is some of the most vanilla stuff that happens in the BDSM scene. Studies have repeatedly found that many women (at least in the U.S.) – usually around 50% – will admit to being turned on by the idea of rape. The same number show signs of physical arousal when reading graphic descriptions of rape. So statistically, this shit is actually kinda normal. Go figure. (Actually, as far as I can tell, no one’s bothered to find out how many women find the idea of raping other people hot. It may be that this desire is actually what’s kinky).

(THESE NUMBERS DO NOT MEAN THAT IT IS ANY WAY ACCEPTABLE TO GO OUT AND ACTUALLY RAPE PEOPLE. THEY DON’T MEAN THAT ‘SHE WAS ASKING FOR IT’ IF SHE GETS RAPED. THE POINT OF ‘RAPE PLAY’ AND ‘CONSENSUAL NON-CONSENT’ IS TO CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE PEOPLE CAN SAFELY DO THINGS THAT ARE ABSOLUTELY ONLY HOT IN FANTASY.)

I suppose before I go any further, I should go ahead and say that, thank the goddess, I have no history of sexual abuse, trauma, etc. I would certainly like to keep it that way. But for much of my adolescence, and for all of my sexual life, the idea of rape persisted as something that sounded pretty hot. I remember being disconcertingly turned on as a 14-year-old, reading a scene in a novel that described a woman being gangraped, and when the men’s dicks were too tired, they used a sword to fuck her instead (I thought, and still do, that that sounds really hot as long as I don’t die like she does in the book). At around the same age, I vividly remember waking up from a dream where I was raped – a dream, mind you, not a nightmare. I was concerned that these desires meant that I was pretty fucked up, so I was quite relieved in college when I encountered those statistics reassuring me that lots of American women thought the IDEA of rape was hot.

I spent a lot of time as a teenager trying to work through the contorted mental gymnastics on that one. I eventually concluded that I found the idea of rape hot, but not one little iota of the reality of it hot. I never walked down lonely streets in the hopes that some stranger would jump out and rape me. I never went out on dates with guys and thought, “I hope he takes me against my will!” (okay, let’s be honest, I wasn’t really going out on dates with anybody then, but you get my point). As I got older, I did occasionally fantasize about specific guys I was already having sex with taking me over my protests, but since I was pretty sexually mature at that point, I just told them that, and we negotiated a scene. I still vastly prefer having my ass taken over my protests than because I politely ask for it (my evilest partner occasionally makes me beg him to “please rape my ass” because he’s a sick fuck).

It was harder to come to terms with the fact that being told “no” by someone turned ME on. I didn’t (and still don’t) like being told “no” for vanilla sex … But I love hearing the quaver in a guy’s voice begging me not to shove my foot up his ass … and doing it anyway. Feeling other people’s fear turns me on a lot, as does feeling like I’m in control of them. I particularly like using the twisted line on people, “if you cum, no one will ever believe that I’ve raped you.”

… But I only do this with people if they’ve consented.

Intellectually, I realize that rape play is some pretty fucked up shit. When I attended FrozenMeursault’s excellent workshop on rape play, he had created a handout for inspiring different kinds of scenes. To make the handout, he had taken a psychological criminal profile analysis of different types of rapists and rape scenarios. I confess, I didn’t find this particularly comforting. But I’ve longed for violence and screams and threats in my sex since long before my first kiss. I’ve had many years to try to come to terms with this part of myself. It’s not something that I would ever engage in as either a top or a bottom with someone I didn’t know well.

Honestly, the vast majority of my long-term partners have been/are so into consensual non-consent in general and rape play in particular that it just feels pretty normal to me. While I know a lot of rape-play fetishists have histories of sexual trauma (and some of them use rape scenes to cathartically work through their trauma), most of my long-term partners don’t have histories of sexual trauma, and they’re just into it because it’s sexy and we’re kinky. On the whole, it doesn’t feel like some deep emotionally laden thing; it’s just what we do on Saturday night. All the partners I’ve played with like this are switches too, so it’s easy to just take turns violating each other. Hell, even with my partner who has a crazy history of sexual trauma, it doesn’t feel like some Emotionally Heavy Thing (although I’m always at least a little aware that I might accidentally trip some button one day and turn him into a ball of emotional goo. But this is the guy who came up with popular FetLife fetish “Want to play rape?” “No!” “That’s the spirit!” before FetLife started erasing all our fun rape fetishes. We’ve been talking about it for five years. I feel reasonably secure).

Rape play isn’t something that I do casually; it’s something that I only do with people I trust A LOT. I realize that it’s really psychologically (and depending on what I do, potentially physically) risky. I only do heavy rape play scenes with people I trust to use safewords if we happen to hit unexpected triggers. But really, as hard as this might be to believe, most of the time, “rape play” rarely feels very extreme to me. It’s just … hot.

“Rape play” is crazy, dangerous, and potentially triggering … but so is most BDSM. This is what we do: try to find safe(ish) ways to manifest dangerous desires. Is it really so extreme?

Yingtai: Thank God I’m not the only one. Even if my thing is not-dubious consent rather than not-rape. And I do want to acknowledge that not everyone is as lucky as me and this author.If you would like to help me say thank you to Dr. Slut, go follow her blog. And also check out all her amazing writing on FetLife (login required), especially if you’re interested in polyamory.
A longer version of this essay was simultaneously published on FetLife (login required).

Top Trust: Guest Post by Dr. Slut

Today’s guest post is about an ethical top’s second-worst nightmare.

Trigger warning: Rape role-play, pushing boundaries, hardcore knives.

Care bear with rainbow-coloured infinity symbol over an outlined heart
Image: Dr. Slut

We’re so used to talking about bottoms trusting tops. It seems so obvious: if you’re going to let somebody beat you up, stab you with needles, shove a fist up your ass, whip you, dangle you by ropes, etc. etc. etc., you want to believe that they know what they’re doing, that they’ll respect you as a person, that they won’t seriously injure you accidentally, that they won’t seriously injure you intentionally, and that they’ll honor your safewords. I find these concerns so compelling that I just flat-out don’t do pick-up play as a bottom, and I’m regularly astounded when other people do (unless it’s with someone with a seriously good reputation for whatever it is that they’re doing).

But something we don’t hear nearly as much about is the trust tops place in bottoms. What do tops trust their bottoms to do? It’s pretty simple: communicate with them honestly and forgive them if they (the tops) the fuck up.

I started thinking about this issue quite some time ago, when I first read SherynB’s powerful piece called “Assent Matters”. It’s a piece which I find compelling and thought-provoking, although I still feel slightly ambivalent about whether or not I agree with it. You see, I trained as a top on my husband, and he’s the second-worst kind of bottom to learn on. The worst kind doesn’t communicate; the second-worst kind flat-out tells you, “When I’m in subspace, I completely lose the ability to determine what is safe for me, and I have to completely trust you to make that determination.” Ugh! What a fucking responsibility! That crazy fucker will literally beg and plead in subspace for things that will injure him, and it’s all up to me as the top to tell him “no.” Obviously, it means that he has to be forgiving if I go too far, but it has bred a cynical caution into my topping that means I just never really trust bottoms.

My lack of trust is especially tricky because I’m a “rape” fetishist. (And let’s be clear here, by “rape” I mean consensual play in which someone roleplays refusing sexual activities, not actual rape). For some reason, since I’m a femme-y girl, people tend to carelessly assume this means I’m a rape bottom … and it’s certainly true; but I’m also a rape top. What I really am is a rape switch, and regardless of which side I’m on, I tend to fantasize about the other one at any given time. But it’s a fantasy I almost never actually indulge because it’s just so goddamned easy to fuck it up. Last weekend was the first time I’ve ever “raped” anyone other than my husband, and we tried so very, very hard to negotiate the scene carefully. Fortunately, it went beautifully—better than I could have dreamed, really, but part of the reason I felt so comfortable was because I was just working as my husband’s accomplice, and I didn’t have to take as much responsibility for dominant decisions. And yet the hottest moment for me occurred when he told me to put my knife to her nipples, and instead of doing that, I looked straight into her eyes and said, “I’d rather put it in her pussy,” held it against her clit, and watched her pupils almost completely dilate as she came in terror. The thing is: pushing boundaries is HOT.

Initially, we (me, my husband, and his girlfriend) talked about doing the scene in public—which I’m much more comfortable with. As either a top or bottom, when playing hard, I like for there to be witnesses and people to help out if something goes wrong. But my husband, who’s not an exhibitionist, said that for him, “rape scenes are private.” His girlfriend laughed, saying, “It makes it sound like for you, rape scenes are really romantic.” He thought about it for a moment and said seriously, “They are.” When you consider the amount of trust that a bottom places into the hands of a top, and the amount of trust the top places in the bottom, to make a rape scene work, his point is entirely valid—not to mention the aftercare needs.

I think the hardest thing for me to cope with as a top is the fine line between “one of the hottest scenes I’ve ever done” and “consent violation.” While there may be some people out there who think that spontaneity has no place in BDSM, I’m going to have to smile and nod and say that we do kink on different planets. All of the hottest scenes I’ve done have had some fairly substantial elements of spontaneity to them. I negotiated a clothes-cutting-off-with-a-knife scene that climaxed with the knife in my pussy (what can I say? We like knives around here). Did I explicitly consent beforehand to having a knife in my pussy? No. Had it ever happened before in my life? No. Was it one of the sexiest things that I’ve ever done? Yes. Do I feel like my consent was violated? No—because I could have stopped it whenever I wanted. But as a top, I’m petrified of crossing that line where someone feels violated and then stops the scene and gets left feeling shaken and lost. The willingness and desire to feel out where those boundaries are requires a tremendous amount of trust, and a feeling of intimacy that I really do know what this bottom wants.

And I honestly believe it requires more trust as a top than as a bottom. Because I have a lot of faith in my resilience to recover from “having my consent violated” (knock on wood). But I think I’d be a lot harder pressed to recover from having my name plastered over FetLife as an “abuser.”

Maybe it’s safer to be a bottom.

Yingtai: I am so sorry that this post has brought back terrible memories for at least one reader. I’ve added a trigger warning.

I can only say that like the author, I really do enjoy being pushed just enough by someone I trust, but I wouldn’t be brave enough to push someone else in the same way. And as a bottom, I value this reminder that tops are vulnerable too.

If you would like to help me say thank you to the author, go follow her blog. And also check out all her amazing writing on FetLife (login required), especially if you’re interested in polyamory.

When a Dom Drops Hard: Guest Post by Cowhideman

Today’s guest blogger is Cowhideman, the patient and prolific leader of FetLife’s Novices & Newbies group (login required).

Crucially for us, he’s also brave enough to talk about the glory and horror of topspace. Enjoy!

Photograph of Cowhideman

In a recent discussion thread, someone mentioned that their relatively novice Dom has suddenly shut down and very nearly stopped being sexual. The sub was wondering if it related to his religious upbringing, which is why there are references to being Catholic in my answer. As I said in my answer, I have no idea from what was said in the thread whether his experience matched mine, but that it sounded familiar from my past life experience.

Here was my observation:

Actually, I honestly don’t find it that odd for someone to have a period of successful D/s and then slam himself shut. It very nearly happened to me, and I thought I had worked through all the religiously related things years earlier when I came out as gay (and was summarily pitched out of the Church).

Can’t say whether this is anything resembling what is going on for him – all we have is what you told us, and you’ve made it clear that you don’t know what’s going on. But here’s something that happened to me and nearly scared the hell out of me.

I had gotten through my personal issues about being sexual, and in my case about being gay, and had dated and had sex in those relationships, and, having known all along that I was turned on by leather and kink and S&M, eventually set out to include that in my sex life.

To great success. I “knew what to expect” (having watched plenty of porn and all) and had found a wonderful community that included people teaching me what to do and how to do it safely, and was starting to get good at a few of my favorite activities. For about six or eight months, I connected up with some wonderful playmates, including one who was starting to turn out to be a regular playmate and, while we both openly agreed it probably wasn’t going to turn out to be True Love, he was as interested in “really getting into it” with someone he trusted as I was.

So we did. And it was great. And it was hot, and we were safe, and all was well. I was topping and domming and getting turned on and getting off, and he was submitting and bottoming and we were having a great time.

And then, completely unexpectedly, one day, with nothing else being the slightest bit different, something new happened that nobody had ever (successfully) warned me about. It was one of those situations where people had said, and I had heard, but until it happened to me, I never realized just what it was that they had been telling me.

Some inner wall went down, some door opened, and I went into an altered state I had never dreamed existed. At no point did I ever lose control – in fact, I was more in control than I had ever been in my life – but the entire world went away except him and me and the toys I was using, and then the boundaries in my head between what was him and what was me and what were the toys blurred, all my actual conscious thought went away, and something completely animal while at the same time totally controlled happened. There were no bodies, there were no people, there was just the moment, and the sexual energy. I was conscious of every tiny movement of his body, every flinch, every moan, every gasp. I WAS those flinches, moans, and gasps, because I could cause them exactly when and how I wanted. His body became an extension of mine and he melted into me.

And I cannot describe how intensely I loved causing those reactions. I would say that I loved “beating the crap out of him” because that’s genuinely how it felt, but it wasn’t that, because I didn’t leave a mark on him or cross any limit of his or of mine, but one of the incredible thrills of it was being consumed by the intensely erotic knowledge that the only reason I wasn’t literally beating him black and blue without mercy was because I didn’t choose to, and that if at any moment I changed that decision, then that’s exactly what would happen.

If virginity was sitting at home dreaming of the beach, and vanilla sex for me had been paddling around where I could touch bottom and stand up any time I chose, I had felt that what I had been doing in leather and S&M had been going out into the deep water and swimming, confidently, fearlessly. This was being picked up by a huge crashing wave and, standing on top of it, surfing with complete control, knowing that I could fall off and be tumbled at any instant, and at the same time, knowing that that was simply not going to happen. It was glorious.

And when the scene was over, and I came back into my body and into the real world, I was absolutely horrified. It’s hard to explain, looking back, but it completely rocked my sense of who I am. I had worked out all of the things we tell people who have moral and ethical issues about kink – it’s not only fine, but actually wonderful, when both people really want this, it’s not using people who want to be used, and there’s nothing wrong with enjoying giving and receiving pain as one of the many erotic sensations involved in consensual sexual play. I believed that going into it or I never would have started.

I had seen myself as a wonderful, warm, decent guy who had an edge and enjoyed a wider range of sexual activities than my vanilla peers did, and was happy to be one, and thrilled that I had finally gotten a chance to live it. But now I knew that wasn’t the truth. I wasn’t a decent guy who had a vibrant kinky sex life. I was a monster. I wasn’t someone who enjoyed S&M. I was someone who enjoyed S&M. All of a sudden, it wasn’t a game any more. And what the hell did that mean? If I wasn’t who I had always thought I was, who the hell was I? What kind of person gets off on doing this stuff? This was completely Jekyll and Hyde territory, and nobody had ever really said how incredible it was to let Hyde out.

If I had read what I just wrote before this happened to me, I would have said, “Well, yeah, I know all that. How overly dramatic! It’s just about ethical choices, and I understand that, and I have made those choices. Good God, get over yourself.” But when it happened, it knocked me for a complete loop, scared the hell out of me, and drove me into sexual seclusion for a while. And that was without a committed partner that I had any fear of hurting.

It wasn’t about them, it was about me. I had to come to terms all over again with who I knew I was. People all my life had cavalierly talked about having a “dark side” or about “embracing their shadow self” – and suddenly it wasn’t poetry or psychobabble. It was me.

Enough of that – end result is, I came to realize that yes, it’s real, and yes, it’s true, but that having those feelings has nothing whatsoever to do with losing control, and that for me, having them come out was a measure of the control I did have, not a measure of the lack of control. It really reinforced for me how fundamental consent, limits and negotiations are – I often sense that the Doms who brush those considerations aside in the blithe reassurance that “Oh, I am so damn good I can read any sub like a book” have never had this experience, and may never have it. And if so, that doesn’t mean they aren’t perfectly safe to play with (though I’d make sure to pay real close attention to find out if that’s as true as they claim.)

It still happens to me. Actually, more often than not, but now the “monster” is an old friend, and I love surfing while letting myself be him, because I’ve built up the life experience to know that I’m never out of control, and truly can stop and act responsibly whenever I need to.

Long-winded. But whenever a Top or Dom who was happily galloping along with their dominance comes to a screeching halt, pulls in, closes down, and slams their sex life shut, I can’t help but suspect that something like this is a possible explanation. If so, you aren’t dealing with someone who has suddenly decided he doesn’t like S&M or D/s, but that it isn’t a game any more, they are scared as hell that they won’t be able to handle it, and that they’ve discovered that they are some sort of monster – the kind that everyone tells everyone else to watch out for and shun completely.

I hesitate to use religious metaphors – and while the Catholic tradition doesn’t put nearly the weight on the “born again” experience that many Protestant traditions do, in a lot of ways it’s very similar. It’s an overwhelming experience of having what you thought you knew and what you thought you were doing utterly transformed in an instant into something permanently and entirely different, without appearing to change materially in any outward way. It’s disorienting, and frightening, and the phrase, “Oh, that’s what everyone was talking about!” doesn’t even begin to cover it.

If that’s what he’s experienced, reassure him that he’s not alone, he’s not a monster, a lot of us have been through it, there’s nothing wrong with him, and while he’d be a complete idiot to think “nothing could go wrong,” (because it could, and he damn well knows it, that’s the whole point), what is true is that he is fully capable of making sure that nothing will go wrong, and that the kinds of things, like accidental bruises or hurt feelings if he does overreach when he’s on the edge, that will go wrong are things that you are happy to sign up for and that you trust him, because you know him, to stop when he needs to stop.

I Wish I’d Said That

I usually update every 5 days. But my chronic aches have been bad. I’m officially out of pre-written posts.

Will I manage another one by 1 August? Wish me luck!

The French have a word for it: l’esprit d’escalier. Literally, staircase wit. The perfect retort that only occurs to you after it’s too late.

But it’s not too late to blog about it! #YesAllWomen, #YouOKSis?

At BDSM munch: You’re so shy.

Me: I’m normal. Everyone else is weird.

At work: Are you attached?

Me: What’s your salary?

At BDSM club: How come you never play?

Me: Because you, personally, are not good enough.

Sometimes more is merited. Including stage directions.

Man in the street: Knee How!

I turn around, allowing linguistic anguish to spread over my face. For a full 30 seconds if possible.

Me: That is not what we say in my country.

Man: What do you say then?

Me: We don’t say hello to strangers. The only men who try to do that are very … low-class.

I know that not everyone suffers from tone-deaf Orientalist greetings. The bigger problem is men randomly telling us to smile in the street. Apparently it happens to supermodels too.

The diagnosis is monotonously alike in all cases: they just want positive interactions with a pretty woman. Unfortunately, they’re stuck with a low-efficiency approach due to insecurity and ignorance.

But think of the lovely things you can do with all that insecure male ego if you unleash your inner sadist!

Man in the street: Aww, pretty lady, it’s not that bad! Smile! Let’s see those pearly whites!

I stop and slowly look up and down the length of his body, with growing horror on my face.

Me: Good God, man, pull yourself together! Stand up straight! Tuck in your shirt! And don’t try to talk to strangers like that! I know things are bad, but you don’t have to advertise that you’re a loser, right? Chin up!

Once a teacher, always a teacher. I had no idea the experience would come in so useful.

But for my next BDSM pub night, it’s tempting to go back even further in time.

The guys at my table can’t seem to stop doing that (American) wannabe alpha thing. The women have basically given up on trying to talk and are glumly nursing their drinks.

I write a note and leave the table.

The note says: Ladies, shall we let them get on with the dominance competition? There are some nice guys over there who might want to actually talk to us. Gentlemen, good luck for next time.

God, I would love to do that. But I won’t. Not just because it’s a soggy potato chip. I’ve got to remember that it’s not just insecurity talking, it’s ignorance too.

Once a teacher, always a teacher. Here’s what I should say.

Very, very gently.

Man: Knee How!

Me: I’m afraid there are quite a lot of languages in Asia, and people can be quite offended if you assume. Also, you know you just made me feel interchangeable with every single Asian woman in the world, right?

I really don’t want to leave this country with such a bad impression of American men.

And if I ever move to a neighbourhood where people tell me to smile:

Man: Smile, baby!

Me: You know that makes me feel like the opposite of smiling, right? This is exactly the way I imagine rapists act on their days off.

And you’ve soured me on the next 50 men I meet. If it happens to me ten more times before I get home, I might have to lock myself into the bathroom and cry. Was that your intention?

It is the sad truth that for some of these men, the honest answer to that question would be yes. I would stick to well-lighted, well-trafficked areas for delivering these public service messages. You’ll still have lots of opportunities.

And I know I wouldn’t have the strength to say this ten times running. I truly respect the women who deal with this all the time and don’t end up shaking in the bathroom.

For the rest of us … maybe we can pass them notes instead?

BDSM pub night. Willy-waving ensues.

This note says: Ladies, this dominance competition is making it hard to get a word in edgewise. Shall we just pass notes until they get over it?

Men: What are you doing?

Me: Are you sure you want to know? Okay, then, read this note. What do you suggest we should do next time? Because I know you didn’t mean to make things so boring for us.

I really recommend this approach. Not the note-passing necessarily, but the sincere question: “What do you think I should do about your behaviour?”

Though I suspect it needs to go through several iterations to reach effectiveness. Till then, you can always pass notes!

Do you have any retorts to share?

 

Pain Is a Battering Bastard … And More (Part 2)

To recap part 1 of this post:

(1) Chronic pain can make even a masochist feel trapped in her body.

(2) It’s just like the way my ex-dom and I felt locked in a miserable relationship.

I may even have gotten all of my mixed metaphors into this tweet:

Please let me be clear that despite all this talk of battering, that’s not what my husband was doing to me. We were being bad for each other.

My body, on the other hand, was most definitely whumping me. But then again, maybe that was mutual too. The body and soul can do awful non-consensual things to each other. They knew that even in the 17th century.

A Dialogue between the Soul and the Body

(Or see modernised rendering)

SOUL
O who shall, from this dungeon, raise
A soul enslav’d so many ways?
With bolts of bones, that fetter’d stands
In feet, and manacled in hands;
Here blinded with an eye, and there
Deaf with the drumming of an ear;
A soul hung up, as ’twere, in chains
Of nerves, and arteries, and veins;
Tortur’d, besides each other part,
In a vain head, and double heart.

BODY
O who shall me deliver whole
From bonds of this tyrannic soul?
Which, stretch’d upright, impales me so
That mine own precipice I go;
And warms and moves this needless frame,
(A fever could but do the same)
And, wanting where its spite to try,
Has made me live to let me die.
A body that could never rest,
Since this ill spirit it possest.

SOUL
What magic could me thus confine
Within another’s grief to pine?
Where whatsoever it complain,
I feel, that cannot feel, the pain;
And all my care itself employs;
That to preserve which me destroys;
Constrain’d not only to endure
Diseases, but, what’s worse, the cure;
And ready oft the port to gain,
Am shipwreck’d into health again.

BODY
But physic yet could never reach
The maladies thou me dost teach;
Whom first the cramp of hope does tear,
And then the palsy shakes of fear;
The pestilence of love does heat,
Or hatred’s hidden ulcer eat;
Joy’s cheerful madness does perplex,
Or sorrow’s other madness vex;
Which knowledge forces me to know,
And memory will not forego.
What but a soul could have the wit
To build me up for sin so fit?
So architects do square and hew
Green trees that in the forest grew.

Yep, that was me. My body’s best trick was making me physically unable to read half of my books for months. Gave me shooting pains in the wrists. And my depression retaliated by wrecking my tailbone and ribs and knees and feet. Before I knew it, I was just as depressed about the pain as the breakup, and the resulting positive feedback loop was … not positive.

I can tell you, I really wanted out of my body. Or my life.

But according to the visionary writer Ursula Le Guin, there is an alternative to walking away from the pain. You can simply go through.

“Suf­fer­ing is a mis­un­der­stand­ing …. It ex­ists. It’s real. I can call it a mis­un­der­stand­ing, but I can’t pre­tend that it doesn’t exist, or will ever cease to exist. Suf­fer­ing is the con­di­tion on which we live. And when it comes, you know it. You know it as the truth. Of course it’s right to cure dis­eases, to pre­vent hunger and in­jus­tice, as the so­cial or­gan­ism does. But no so­ci­ety can change the na­ture of ex­is­tence. We can’t pre­vent suf­fer­ing. This pain and that pain, yes, but not Pain. A so­ci­ety can only re­lieve so­cial suf­fer­ing, un­nec­es­sary suf­fer­ing. The rest re­mains. The root, the re­al­ity.

“All of us here are going to know grief; if we live fifty years, we’ll have known pain for fifty years. And in the end we’ll die. That’s the con­di­tion we’re born on. I’m afraid of life! There are times I — I am very fright­ened. Any hap­pi­ness seems triv­ial.

“And yet, I won­der if it isn’t all a mis­un­der­stand­ing — this grasp­ing after hap­pi­ness, this fear of pain …. If in­stead of fear­ing it and run­ning from it, one could … get through it, go be­yond it. There is some­thing be­yond it. It’s the self that suf­fers, and there’s a place where the self — ceases. I don’t know how to say it. But I be­lieve that the re­al­ity — the truth that I rec­og­nize in suf­fer­ing as I don’t in com­fort and hap­pi­ness — that the re­al­ity of pain is not pain. If you can get through it. If you can en­dure it all the way.”

My initial reaction to this was: Bullshit. Been sick, been well. Well is better. We don’t need pain.

Unless you want to believe in something higher, that is. According to my religious history professor, the greatest blow ever struck to religion was effective painkillers. Suddenly you didn’t need a reason for your suffering. You could leave that battering bastard behind.

But sometimes, of course, you don’t want to get away. As sadists and masochists, we know that pain can be delicious, thrilling, beguiling. And I have come to believe that every kink is rooted in some experience that feels good for vanillas too. So what is this about pain that can make us feel like we have touched the hand of God?

It turns out that Ursula Le Guin has the answer to that, too. It comes at the end of the same conversation I quoted above. They’re talking about a man dying from full-body burns.

“You couldn’t do any­thing for him. There was no aid to give. Maybe he knew we were there, I don’t know. It didn’t do him any good. You couldn’t do any­thing for him. Then I saw … you see … I saw that you can’t do any­thing for any­body. We can’t save each other. Or our­selves.”

“What have you left, then? Iso­la­tion and de­spair! You’re deny­ing broth­er­hood, Shevek!” the tall girl cried.

“No — no, I’m not. I’m try­ing to say what I think broth­er­hood re­ally is. It be­gins — it be­gins in shared pain.”

I think Ursula Le Guin is right, at least about me. My pain is getting better because of all the people helping me. Their professional knowledge of alternative medicine helps, but the moral support is what makes the difference between depression and progress. You could say my body and I are in marriage counselling.

And I think Ursula Le Guin is right about BDSM, too. She’s just described my price for offering up my body and soul as your plaything: that you make the journey with me. Your focus in exchange for my everything else. Know my pain carnally, as I know your pleasures.

That’s how we come to live in each other’s minds. That’s how pain turns into magic, holiness, love.

I wonder, can I turn this around and make it into my metric for when to get out of a relationship? God knows I need something. Because it is really, really hard to know your breaking point when you’re tuned to abject submission. For me it’s not just the body, not just the heart, not just the soul – all of me just wants to take it.

I do have a lot of ego and willpower. But none of that tells you when to stop. It just keeps everyone on the rack for longer.

So here’s what I will tell myself next time. The red flag is when the pain stops being shared – whatever kind it is. When the power exchange starts becoming a reservoir of misery, and before it becomes an oubliette of all feeling.

That’s when it’s time for the black hole to go wormhole.

See you on the other side? Perhaps we will find something to share.

 

Modernised rendering of
A Dialogue between the Soul and the Body

SOUL
Oh, who will rescue from this dungeon
A soul enslaved in so many ways?
With bolts of bones, that stands fettered
In feet, and manacled in hands.
Here blinded by an eye, and there
Deafened by the drumming of an ear;
A soul hung up, as it were, in chains
Of nerves, and arteries, and veins;
Tortured, on top of every other body part,
With an empty head, and a double heart.

BODY
Oh, who will rescue and preserve me
From the bonds of this tyrannical soul?
It pierces me, stretched upright
So that I fall headlong to my own doom;
It warms and moves this needless frame,
(Even a fever could do the same)
And wanting somewhere to try its spite,
Has made me live to let me die.
A body that has found no rest
Since this ill spirit took possession.

SOUL
What magic could confine me thus
To pine within another’s grief?
Whatever it complains of here,
I feel the pain I cannot feel.
And it employs all my care
To preserve the thing that destroys me;
Forced not only to endure
Diseases, but even worse, the cure;
So often ready to come safe into port,
I am shipwrecked into health again.

BODY
But no medicine could ever reach
The sicknesses you teach to me;
You tear me first with the cramp of hope,
And then the palsy shakes of fear,
Heated by the pestilence of love,
Eaten by hatred’s hidden ulcer;
Joy’s cheerful madness perplexes,
And sorrow’s other madness vexes;
Your knowledge forces me to know,
And memory will not let it go.
What but a soul could have the wit
To build me up so fit for sin?
Just as architects square and smite
The forest trees that once grew green.

– Original poem by Andrew Marvell
– Modernised by Xiao Yingtai, with help

Click to return to original poem.

Pain Is a Battering Bastard … And More (Part 1)

Once upon a time my dom was nursing me through some truly horrific cramps.

I was not very lucid. A particularly vicious cramp took me by surprise, and I found myself whimpering our safeword.

I will never forget the look on his face.

To cheer us both up, he told me that I had a belly god, a dark and hungry one. I loved that, because one of my favourite lines of poetry was “The body is a temple of pain.” And unfortunately for this masochist, whatever lived in my temple had developed a real taste for smiting.

I looked for that poem fondly when I started this blog. But either my memory played me false, or we have better translations now. Please brace yourself. For me, at least, this is kink-proof material.

Tortures

Nothing has changed.
The body is a reservoir of pain;
it has to eat and breathe the air, and sleep;
it has thin skin and the blood is just beneath it;
it has a good supply of teeth and fingernails;
its bones can be broken; its joints can be stretched.
In tortures, all of this is considered.

Nothing has changed.
The body still trembles as it trembled
before Rome was founded and after,
in the twentieth century before and after Christ.
Tortures are just what they were, only the earth has shrunk
and whatever goes on sounds as if it’s just a room away.

Nothing has changed.
Except there are more people,
and new offenses have sprung up beside the old ones –
real, make-believe, short-lived and nonexistent.
But the cry with which the body answers for them
was, is, and will be a cry of innocence
in keeping with the age-old scale and pitch.

Nothing has changed.
Except perhaps the manners, ceremonies, dances.
The gesture of the hands shielding the head
has nonetheless remained the same.
The body writhes, jerks and tugs,
falls to the ground when shoved, pulls up its knees,
bruises, swells, drools and bleeds.

Nothing has changed.
Except the run of the rivers,
the shape of forests, shores, deserts, and glaciers.
The little soul roams among those landscapes,
disappears, returns, draws near, moves away,
evasive and a stranger to itself,
now sure, now uncertain of its own existence,
whereas the body is and is and is
and has nowhere to go.

Shudder. I know I writhe and fall and bruise, and I love it. But not this. If it works for you, that’s great, but Wisława Szymborska has succeeded in blacking out my kink-coloured glasses.

So I scratched that poem from my list of blog ideas. But recently I was reminded of it while tweeting angrily about my chronic pain.

To be honest, I was a lot more sanguinary than that.

“Ow! Ow! OW! What do you think? My bloody tailbone is talking to me in bloody tongues! My wrists got tired of zapping me with lightning and they called in the bloody reinforcements! OW!

Why was this tweet-worthy news? I’ll tell you.

Yes, my body likes to non-consensually hurt me. It’s a bitch bastard. And I have nowhere to go, like Wisława Szymborska’s poem says. It really is unnervingly like an abusive relationship as described by the great feminist writer Margaret Atwood:

you fit into me

you fit into me
like a hook into an eye

a fish hook
an open eye

Unfortunately, I know the kind of relationship she’s talking about. Except it was mutual in my case. My wonderful cramp-nursing belly-god-quipping partner and I broke up because we decided to stop being bad for each other. Pain had become the order of things. It filled every space, but we couldn’t imagine life without each other, so surely it was love, surely it had to be right?

It took a ridiculously long time for us to even see that we could leave the pain behind. When your boots are gone, that’s when you really need to walk.

Reader, I left him. We stopped hurting each other.

I’m so glad I’m getting to that point with my body, too.

Part 2 features 17th century poetry and science fiction. And I wasn’t even trying to be weird.
 
1
1
Accept
Decline
http://google.ca

Accept Decline