Trigger warning: Rape role-play, pushing boundaries, hardcore knives.
Weāre so used to talking about bottoms trusting tops. It seems so obvious: if youāre going to let somebody beat you up, stab you with needles, shove a fist up your ass, whip you, dangle you by ropes, etc. etc. etc., you want to believe that they know what theyāre doing, that theyāll respect you as a person, that they wonāt seriously injure you accidentally, that they wonāt seriously injure you intentionally, and that theyāll honor your safewords. I find these concerns so compelling that I just flat-out donāt do pick-up play as a bottom, and Iām regularly astounded when other people do (unless itās with someone with a seriously good reputation for whatever it is that theyāre doing).
But something we donāt hear nearly as much about is the trust tops place in bottoms. What do tops trust their bottoms to do? Itās pretty simple: communicate with them honestly and forgive them if they (the tops) the fuck up.
I started thinking about this issue quite some time ago, when I first read SherynBās powerful piece called āAssent Mattersā. Itās a piece which I find compelling and thought-provoking, although I still feel slightly ambivalent about whether or not I agree with it. You see, I trained as a top on my husband, and heās the second-worst kind of bottom to learn on. The worst kind doesnāt communicate; the second-worst kind flat-out tells you, āWhen Iām in subspace, I completely lose the ability to determine what is safe for me, and I have to completely trust you to make that determination.ā Ugh! What a fucking responsibility! That crazy fucker will literally beg and plead in subspace for things that will injure him, and itās all up to me as the top to tell him āno.ā Obviously, it means that he has to be forgiving if I go too far, but it has bred a cynical caution into my topping that means I just never really trust bottoms.
My lack of trust is especially tricky because Iām a “rape” fetishist. (And let’s be clear here, by “rape” I mean consensual play in which someone roleplays refusing sexual activities, not actual rape). For some reason, since Iām a femme-y girl, people tend to carelessly assume this means Iām a rape bottom … and itās certainly true; but Iām also a rape top. What I really am is a rape switch, and regardless of which side Iām on, I tend to fantasize about the other one at any given time. But itās a fantasy I almost never actually indulge because itās just so goddamned easy to fuck it up. Last weekend was the first time Iāve ever ārapedā anyone other than my husband, and we tried so very, very hard to negotiate the scene carefully. Fortunately, it went beautifullyābetter than I could have dreamed, really, but part of the reason I felt so comfortable was because I was just working as my husbandās accomplice, and I didnāt have to take as much responsibility for dominant decisions. And yet the hottest moment for me occurred when he told me to put my knife to her nipples, and instead of doing that, I looked straight into her eyes and said, āIād rather put it in her pussy,ā held it against her clit, and watched her pupils almost completely dilate as she came in terror. The thing is: pushing boundaries is HOT.
Initially, we (me, my husband, and his girlfriend) talked about doing the scene in publicāwhich Iām much more comfortable with. As either a top or bottom, when playing hard, I like for there to be witnesses and people to help out if something goes wrong. But my husband, whoās not an exhibitionist, said that for him, ārape scenes are private.ā His girlfriend laughed, saying, āIt makes it sound like for you, rape scenes are really romantic.ā He thought about it for a moment and said seriously, āThey are.ā When you consider the amount of trust that a bottom places into the hands of a top, and the amount of trust the top places in the bottom, to make a rape scene work, his point is entirely validānot to mention the aftercare needs.
I think the hardest thing for me to cope with as a top is the fine line between āone of the hottest scenes Iāve ever doneā and āconsent violation.ā While there may be some people out there who think that spontaneity has no place in BDSM, Iām going to have to smile and nod and say that we do kink on different planets. All of the hottest scenes Iāve done have had some fairly substantial elements of spontaneity to them. I negotiated a clothes-cutting-off-with-a-knife scene that climaxed with the knife in my pussy (what can I say? We like knives around here). Did I explicitly consent beforehand to having a knife in my pussy? No. Had it ever happened before in my life? No. Was it one of the sexiest things that Iāve ever done? Yes. Do I feel like my consent was violated? Noābecause I could have stopped it whenever I wanted. But as a top, Iām petrified of crossing that line where someone feels violated and then stops the scene and gets left feeling shaken and lost. The willingness and desire to feel out where those boundaries are requires a tremendous amount of trust, and a feeling of intimacy that I really do know what this bottom wants.
And I honestly believe it requires more trust as a top than as a bottom. Because I have a lot of faith in my resilience to recover from āhaving my consent violatedā (knock on wood). But I think Iād be a lot harder pressed to recover from having my name plastered over FetLife as an āabuser.ā
Maybe itās safer to be a bottom.
As you know, I’m so grateful that you wrote this. I feel very strongly that subs can only be ethical if we face up to the power we have over doms. It’s a blog post I HAVE to write, but first other people have to explain to me all the ways we can damage tops.
It’s too bad that so few people want to write about that. I guess it’s the ultimate unsexy topic – except with your Midas touch!
Well, that type of conversation is just so much easier for switches to have, because we have experiences from both sides. I’m constantly bewildered by how much I think most tops and most bottoms just don’t understand about each other. There’s a heavy gender overlap there too that just exacerbates the problem… And I don’t think the Leather tradition of having future tops learn by being bottoms necessarily solves that problem, because if the tops don’t really *enjoy* being a bottom–and especially if they never experience subspace for themselves–then they don’t really learn much except vague irritation.
I’m posting this here for my own benefit. Someone wrote a reply to this post: http://valerynorth.wordpress.com/2014/08/07/trusting-topping-sharing/